Sunday 29 June 2014

Watch hackers attack each other in real-time



A US security company called Norse, which specialises in darknet monitoring, has built a real-time map that shows where cyber-attacks are being launched from around the world.
"Every second, Norse collects and analyses live threat intelligence from darknets in hundreds of locations in over 40 countries," explains the company. "The attacks shown are based on a small subset of live flows against the Norse honeypot infrastructure, representing actual worldwide cyber attacks by bad actors. At a glance, one can see which countries are aggressors or targets at the moment, using which type of attacks."
The result is something that looks more like a video game than reality, particularly if you're familiar with Introversion's classic title Defcon. Keep it running for a while and you'll spy a lot of action coming from both the United States and China.
If you like that map you'll probably also enjoy this one from Kaspersky, which is very similar -- showing attacks on its 60 million users around the world in real-time.

Insane jet-powered hoverboard lets you fly over waves



Catching waves is rad. Flying 16 feet above them on a hoverboard propelled by a stream of high-speed H2O is radder.
The newest  ZR Hoverboard is basically a souped-up wakeboard that uses a rear-mounted water jet to speed you along at up to 16mph. You're not off flipping from crest to crest on your own though -- the hoverboard is tethered to your boat or jet ski with a hose.
The Hoverboard connects to the company's existing  Flyboard, so if you don't already own one, you'll need to pony up extra cash for that and a 1.5-hour training course. Apparently they don't just let anyone strap on a jet-powered hoverboard and speed off into the wild blue yonder, go figure.
To be this fly, it'll cost you at least $2,675 (£ 1,569)  and goes up from there.

Voltset is a redesigned multimeter for makers



Two Danish engineers are hoping to reinvent one of the most basic tools in the maker's arsenal -- the multimeter.
Their vision for what a 21st-century multimeter should look like is the Voltset. It connects to your smartphone, is capable of auto-logging and calculation and has the ability to extend its capabilities with additional sensors. It also requires no batteries to function.
"We thought, 'Well, it's obviously more helpful to base it on the smartphone that everybody brings and just make it an extension of what you already use,'" explained Bruun-Larsen in an interview with Fast Co.
When connected to your phone, it starts a companion app that automatically displays the most relevant information for your project. You can chart, log and share readings, as well as export to Excel. An APK will allow developers to write extensions and add-ons.
The Voltset will support Android and Windows Phone by the time of its launch in December, with iOS functionality planned over Bluetooth before Spring 2015. It's CAT II capable, meaning you can use it around the house -- but not on your fusebox just yet. "We are improving it to be CAT III capable," the pair say on the Kickstarter page for the project.
With 68 hours to go, that Kickstarter has raised almost $100,000 (£58,000) -- comfortably above the $60,000 (£35,000) that Michael Bruun-Larsen and Tom Wang had requested from crowdfunders.
If you want one, it'll set you back $100 (£59) -- with delivery scheduled for December 2014.

Doctor Who returns on 23 August


Doctor 12
Has six months since the Doctor 50th anniversary celebrations been just too long? Well, Whovians, you'll need to hold off another two months, but Peter Capaldi's era as the Doctor is about to begin. 

The BBC has confirmed that the new season will air from Saturday 23 August, pairing the announcement with an ominous teaser trailer. The Doctor can be heard asking, in what sounds like broken English, "Am I good man?" There could be a slurred "a" in there, making enunciation another mystery to be solved if so.
Capaldi plays the 12th Doctor -- not counting some wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey shenanigans that series runner Stephen Moffat used to run through the character's limited number of regenerations -- and will be joined by returning companion Clara Oswald, played by Jenna Coleman. Another new face on board the TARDIS will be Samuel Anderson, playing Danny Pink -- Clara's co-worker and fellow teacher. It all sounds like a deliberate redux of the original set-up for Doctor Who, minus the granddaughter character. Well, at least that we know of....
The new stretch of episodes will run uninterrupted, unlike season seven, which was split over two years, much to Moffat -- and fans' -- chagrin. The first episode is titled 'Deep Breath', and is set to be "feature length". To be fair, a movie length episode is the least the Beeb could do after keeping us waiting a full eight months.

Tuesday 24 June 2014

Study Finds Teens Using Facebook More


In quite the turnaround, it seems Facebook is gaining popularity with young users again.
Forrester Research surveyed 4,517 teens, between the ages of 12 and 17, about social media usage and nearly half said that they were using Facebook more than a year ago.

The survey, first reported by the WSJ, pinpoints smartphone adoption as one of the biggest reasons for the increased Facebook usage, not necessarily their adoration of the platform.
Just last October, Facebook admitted a “decrease in daily users among younger teens,” and several research outlets, such as the Pew Research Center supported this admission.

The Pew study found many teens expressing “waning enthusiasm” for Facebook. Reports like this and Facebook’s acknowledgement has sent the wrong message to marketers, at least according to Nate Elliot, co-author of the Forrester Research report.

Perhaps this is why Facebook launched Slingshot, an app mimicking Snapchat where users are forced to create content to view their friend’s video or photo messages, last week to reignite the spark with its younger audience.

But the problem might just be with Facebook and its efforts to lure a group that wants no part of it.

Slingshot has fallen behind the app Yo, which sends the message “Yo” to a friend. Yo, released on April Fools Day, is ranked 19 on the top charts list in the App Store as of writing and Slingshot is not even on the  chart.

This is an example of Facebook’s failure to attract a group that might never again find it attractive. Some people will never find Facebook cool, and Facebook’s growth into a massive corporation has contributed to that.

However, that hasn’t stopped Facebook adoption from being higher than every other social network apart from YouTube, according to the survey. Perhaps this adoption stems from Facebook’s wide reach that teens feel pressured or find it practical to sign up.

As the Pew study highlights, joining Facebook at a young age feels “lame” because of presence of adults.

“They dislike the increasing number of adults on the site, get annoyed when their Facebook friends share inane details, and are drained by the “drama” that they described as happening frequently on the site,” the Pew study found.

The Forrester research presents different numbers from other research outlets, but there is a strong possibility that those numbers will dip again. For all generations, at a certain point, it will always be uncool to be where your parents are — and they’re on Facebook.


Supercomputer slowdown: World’s fastest system sees no new challengers



The group that measures the world's Top 500 fastest supercomputers hasn't crowned a new champion in more than a year.
Tianhe-2, of China’s National Super Computer Center, took over the top spot in June 2013 with a measured speed of 33.86 petaflop/s, and it held on to #1 in both the November 2013 list and the June 2014 list released yesterday.
The follow-up to Tianhe-1A, Tianhe-2 uses Ivy Bridge-based Intel Xeons and Intel Xeon Phi for a total of 3.12 million cores. The computer uses 17,808 kilowatts of power for 1.9 gigaflop/s per watt and can theoretically hit speeds of up to 54.9 petaflops.
A system maintaining the #1 spot three times in a row isn't unprecedented: IBM's US-based Roadrunner, the first petaflop machine, won three straight titles from June 2008 to June 2009. But in the latest list, the top nine machines are identical to those from six months ago. And even the bottom of the Top 500 is seeing less turnover and growth than usual.
"Since its inception in June 1993, the TOP500 list has served as a consistent measure of the performance growth of supercomputers, since all systems are ranked according to performance running the same Linpack benchmark application," yesterday's announcement said. "For the second consecutive list, the overall growth rate of all the systems is at a historical low."
The only new entry in the top 10 "was at number 10—a 3.14 petaflop/s Cray XC30 installed at an undisclosed US government site," the Top 500 project leaders wrote. A petaflop is one quadrillion, or a thousand trillion, calculations per second.
“Things seem to be slowing down,” University of Tennessee professor Jack Dongarra, who created the Linpack benchmarks and helps compile the bi-annual Top 500 list, told us “You might characterize it as maybe a sign that Moore’s Law is having some issues.”
Some further stats help illustrate the slowdown in growth. This time around, the very last system on the Top 500 list was previously rated as the 384th fastest system in November 2013. "This represents the lowest turnover rate in the list in two decades," the Top 500 announcement said. In other words, fewer new systems are joining the Top 500: In June 2013, the 500th system had fallen all the way from #322.
Between 1994 and 2008, the very last system on the Top 500 list grew performance by an average of 90 percent each year. Since then, the #500 system has improved its performance just 55 percent each year.
The combined performance of all 500 systems hit 274 petaflop/s in the latest list, up from 250 petaflop/s six months ago and 223 petaflop/s one year ago. "This increase in installed performance also exhibits a noticeable slowdown in growth compared to the previous long-term trend," the announcement said.
Supercomputer makers have been boosting speed in part by using co-processors as "accelerators" to handle some of the work that would otherwise be done by CPUs. Sixty-two of the Top 500 systems have co-processors, with 44 of those using Nvidia's graphics processing units. Nvidia is hoping to make ARM a major part of the supercomputing world by pairing 64-bit ARM server processors with its GPU accelerators.
Vendors could increase supercomputer performance a lot more simply by creating ever bigger systems—but it wouldn't necessarily be efficient. Companies are trying to figure out how to efficiently create exascale supercomputers, which would be 1,000 times faster than a petaflop per second. Intel today announced new Xeon Phi processors and a more efficient and lower-latency interconnect, calling the new architecture "the first viable step towards exascale."
Two years ago, Intel said 40 to 50 gigaflops of performance per watt is needed to hit an exaflop, but that milestone is thought to be at least several years away. The most efficient Top 500 supercomputer, which is at the Tokyo Institute of Technology and uses both Intel CPUs and Nvidia GPUs, can hit 4.5 gigaflops per watt.

Hands-Free Driving Coming to New Cars Starting in 2015



The Cruise RP-1 is a system the company calls an autopilot tool for the road. So while it's not exactly a self-driving car mechanism, the Cruise RP-1 represents an incremental — yet major step — toward hands-free driving.
Once installed, simply pressing the Cruise button (pictured below) allows the driver to travel on a highway without touching the steering wheel or foot pedals while the system ensures that the car stays in its lane and maintains a safe distance from other cars in front of it.
Cruise

IMAGE: CRUISE
The system itself can be fitted to nearly any vehicle and consists of a roof-mounted "sensor pod," containing two cameras, a radar mechanism, GPS, inertial sensors and an on-board computer, as well as actuators that control the car's steering, acceleration and braking actions. Using this software/hardware combination, the Cruise RP-1 constantly scans the road to keep the car operating within safe parameters in relation to other cars and the boundaries of the driving environment.
At present, the system, priced at $10,000 (including installation), is slated for a limited rollout in California sometime in 2015. That falls in line with the schedule of road regulations currently being developed to govern autonomous vehicles in California. An initial testing phase is set to launch in September, with full-fledged public autonomous driving rules planned for the first half of the year.
"We'll be fully in compliance when the new rules are introduced during the first half of next year," Cruise CEO Kyle Vogt told us.
"We're calling it a highway autopilot," says Vogt. " 
I don't think it's fair to label it a self-driving system yet. It's an advanced driving system rather than autonomous vehicle."

Along with the car system, the Cruise also features an iOS app that allows the user to see what the system can see in real-time. Connecting to the system via Wi-Fi, the app provides a graphic that displays the cars detected around. 
But despite the fact that it's not a full-on autonomous driving system, the launch of Cruise will immediately lead some to draw comparisons between it and other autonomous-driving-style offerings being touted by the existing players.
"Our initial product is on the [2012 or newer] Audi A4 and F4," says Vogt. "The idea is that it will work on any vehicle, but there is a little bit of integration. But, since we're a small company, we're focusing on one model for now."
Installations of the system will occur at the company's facility in San Francisco.
However, when asked about competing autonomous driving systems working with its cars, without singling out any particular company, Audi spokesperson Brad Stertz told us, "Audi of America does not support or condone the modification of its vehicles by third parties for this or other purposes."
Audi showed off its own "Piloted driving" system earlier this year using the Audi A7.
"We believe that the development of automated vehicles and associated technology must be carried out very carefully and in a step-by-step, iterative manner," says Stertz. "This approach we see as necessary to help ensure that the technology meets the expectations and needs of all stakeholders. Additionally, the legal and regulatory picture remains unsettled state to state."
Audi says its Piloted driving system will be "technologically ready within five years."
Cruise computer

The Cruise RP-1 in-car computer system.
IMAGE: CRUISE
Similarly, BMW also unveiled an automated driving system prototype earlier this year using the BMW M235i. But, when asked about when the system might be ready for commercial use, a BMW spokesperson told us, "We’ve made no announcements (and have none pending) about the possible production future of the autonomous driving technologies."
So while a number of companies — including Google, which hopes to have a pilot program for its automated cars on the road in the next couple of years — are promising automated car systems, by offering a widely applicable solution, Cruise is putting pressure on the major players to ramp up their schedules.
Cruise sensor pod

The Cruise RP-1 roof-mounted sensor pod.
IMAGE: CRUISE
"Until it's actually out there in the cars we don't know if it's just a concept or not," says Vogt, referencing the various systems being touted by major companies. "Also, ours is the only one that I know of that goes from 0 to 80 miles per hour hands free."
At first, only 50 units designed for the Audi will be offered to the public, with reservations for future units currently available for $1,000 each.

Wednesday 11 June 2014

Want to Know How Many Calories Are in Your Food? This Gadget Tells You

What if you could scan an apple in the grocery store and immediately see what it's made of, how many calories are in it and how sweet it is? One group of scientists is making it possible.
SCiO is a pocket-sized molecular sensor patented by Consumer Physics Inc., a startup based out of Tel Aviv, Israel. By placing the sensor near an object and pressing the button for two seconds, SCiO can immediately analyze the object's chemical makeup and send the information via cloud to the user's smartphone, which then shows the desired information on the screen.
While the company has a working prototype of SCiO, the finished product has yet to be created. The device's developers began a Kickstarter campaign to raise $200,000 toward the project. More than 11,000 people have pledged their support, skyrocketing SCiO's financial backing to almost $2.5 million.
Backers will receive the SCiO when it ships in December 2014. 
Check out the video of how the product works, below:

This 370-Inch TV Costs $1.6 Million — and Someone Actually Bought It

Titan-tvTV manufacturers constantly compete to have the biggest consumer TV on the market, showing their plus-size wares at CES. But when it comes to custom one-off models, the sky's the limit. Case in point: the Titan Zeus.
The aptly named Zeus is a TV so large, one struggles to find the right adjective to describe it. Colossal? Gargantuan? Unearthly? At 370 inches diagonal — or more than three times the size of most "gigantic" TVs — the set is truly in a size class of its own.
So far the UK-based Titan Screens has sold only one of these kaiju TVs to a buyer who wants to remain anonymous, according to Engadget. Little wonder: The behemoth costs about $1.6 million, and that doesn't include the arena-size living room for which you'd need to house the 26 x 16-foot panel.

And make no mistake, this is a panel. While enormous home-theater projection screens have existed for decades, the Titan Zeus is a standalone television, with pixels and everything. Quite a few pixels, in fact — it has 4K resolution, and the screen has a 4:3 aspect ratio, per renderings on the Titan website.
A similar, ultra-widescreen version of the Zeus is planned to go on display at Cannes this summer. Mounted on top of the city's Le Grand Hotel, it will be visible from the entire bay, according to this video from Curb Media.


Our dream: Hook up a gaming rig to that baby, and play a little Crysis 3 on it. C'mon, guys, what do you say?

Monday 9 June 2014

A Computer Has Reportedly Passed Turing Test For The First Time

photo credit: Jon Callas. Alan Turing's famous test has been passed for the first time in a controlled trial

Just in time for the 60th anniversary of Alan Turing's death, a group of researchers claim to have developed a program that has passed the test Turing invented for artificial intelligence for the very first time. However, those claims might have been overstated, as many disagree that the Turing test has actually been passed.
At a time when computers were little more than abacuses Turing foresaw, at least dimly, the developments that would come from his pioneering work. Noting that it was very difficult to define what thinking really is, Turing suggested the important test was whether a robot could imitate a human. He proposed that a machine could be defined as intelligent if it could engage in a conversation with someone who could not tell if they were interacting with a human or computer
Presumably the spambots assuring recipients they are horny women just dying to get naked for them fool some people, so a little more definition is required. Turing predicted that by the year 2000, "an average interrogator will not have more than 70% chance of making the right identification" between a human and computer over the course of five minutes. 
However, the 30% pass rate over five minutes was just Turing's prediction for what would be possible at the time, not a requirement of the test itself. That is one benchmark being used to make the claim of passing this test, which is slightly problematic.​
By 2012 researchers were doing well enough that systematic tests were required. At the time, none of the computer programs being tested were able to fool 30% of the judges over the course of a five minute chat. One of them however, “Eugene Goostman”, a chatbot pretending to be a 13 year old boy from Odessa, got very close.
Two years later, Goostman made the grade, although it is unclear to what extent this is a result of improvements in the program, or just a slightly different sample of judges. Moving from just under 29% to the 33% Goostman scored this time doesn't suggest its Russian computer programmers have been bounding along in the meantime – unless the judges are also getting smarter or publicity from Goostman's near success last time altered some judges to his identity.
Critics of this announcement have said that such a small sample size of judges isn't enough to accurately depict the "average investigator" that Turing required. Goostman is also described as a chatbot, not a "supercomputer" as some have reported, which adds to the skepticism.
In the trials, conducted by the Royal Society, judges engage in conversation via text with a mix of human and computer respondents and have to pick which category they think each falls into. Four other computers failed. 
Arguably, pretending to be a 13-year-old whose first language is not English is cheating. "Our main idea was that he can claim that he knows anything, but his age also makes it perfectly reasonable that he doesn't know everything," said Vladimir Veselov, one of the creators of the program. "We spent a lot of time developing a character with a believable personality." 
Nevertheless, some commentators have suggested this is a good time to think about the dangers of tireless computers capable of talking to millions of people at once when it comes to fraud. “Having a computer that can trick a human into thinking that someone, or even something, is a person we trust is a wake-up call to cybercrime,” said Kevin Warwick of the University of Reading, the organizers of the test
Claims of success have been made before, but Warwick says, "this event involved the most simultaneous comparison tests than ever before, was independently verified and, crucially, the conversations were unrestricted. A true Turing Test does not set the questions or topics prior to the conversations. We are therefore proud to declare that Alan Turing's Test was passed for the first time on Saturday.” Still, not everyone is convinced.
Anyone wanting to chat with Goostman, or congratulate him on his success, can do so at http://www.princetonai.com/bot/bot.jsp. Despite telling The Independent, “I feel about beating the Turing test in quite convenient way. Nothing original,” Goostman appears to be a little overwhelmed by all the interest – his site was down when we tried it.

Sunday 8 June 2014

CIA joins Twitter, gets started with amusing tweet

twitter_ipo_610x354

The CIA joined Twitter on Friday, proving it has a sense of humor in the process.
Whether its first tweet was the result of heated discussions across several high-level meetings or a simple off-the-cuff missive posted by a lone operative is hard to say, but its funniness ensured the agency’s verified account got off to a flying start, with the post retweeted more than 160,000 times in a matter of a few hours.
And here it is: “We can neither confirm nor deny that this is our first tweet.” Not bad, eh?
Zeke Johnson of Amnesty International USA was less amused, however, saying in a statement that “the CIA’s first Tweet would be funny if it weren’t for the agency’s use of torture and extra judicial executions.” Johnson added, “They should put as least as much effort into following the law as they do into social media. The full truth about the CIA torture and drone strikes should be made public immediately and those responsible for crimes held accountable.”
While currently following only 25 Twitter accounts – though possibly many more without anyone knowing – the CIA has already picked up more than 260,000 followers, indicating a strong interest among the Twitter community in “the Nation’s first line of defense,” or at least, a strong interest in whether or not it’ll post an equally amusing second tweet.
Followed accounts include the FBI, NASA, Homeland Security and the White House.
The agency also joined Facebook this week, and already has a presence on other sites such as YouTube and Flickr.
“By expanding to these platforms, CIA will be able to more directly engage with the public and provide information on CIA’s mission, history, and other developments,” the agency’s director, John Brennan, said in a release. “We have important insights to share, and we want to make sure that unclassified information about the Agency is more accessible to the American public that we serve, consistent with our national security mission.”
So, no, don’t expect anything too juicy to turn up on the intelligence agency’s Twitter feed. Its social media posts will mostly include the latest CIA-related news, statements, and relevant career information. Followers will also receive updates on the CIA Museum, described by the agency as “the best museum most people never get to see” (it’s not open to the public, y’see.) as well as tidbits from its World Factbook, an impressive online resource which you can find here.
[@CIA]

Twitter announces a mute option to silence annoying users

Twitter-home-page
Detailed on the official Twitter blog earlier today, the social network will be rolling out a new feature that allows users to eliminate another user’s tweets from their main feed. Calling the new feature “Mute,” this will allow Twitter users to remove all tweets and retweets from a specific user within their main timeline while still continuing to actively follow them on the social network. For example, many people might consider muting users that like to spam the feed with multiple posts within a few minutes. It could also be useful to remove user tweets that are mostly comprised of auto-tweeting activity from other services. 
According to the details, you will no longer receive push notifications from a muted user on your mobile devices. Interestingly, the silenced user will have no idea that they have been muted, beyond a noticing a drop in user activity within their own feed. In addition, muting a user isn’t the same as blocking a user. A muted user will still be able to retweet, favorite or reply to your tweets. However, you won’t see any form of notification from Twitter about that activity. That silenced user could be attempting to start a conversation with you, but you won’t realize they are talking to you since they are muted. 
Muted users can be un-muted easily at any time. To mute someone from their profile page, you simply click the gear icon and select the mute option. You can also mute users from the timeline on the Web or the iOS and Android platforms. To mute someone within the feed, you will need to tap the more option before clicking the mute option. At the moment, the mute feature isn’t available to all users. According to the post, Twitter plans to roll out the mute feature to all users over the next few weeks.

Facebook offers ‘Privacy Checkup,’ changes your posts so they aren’t public

Facebook Privacy Checkup
Since when is Facebook concerned about user privacy? Facebook has a very bad reputation when it comes to user privacy, but now it seems that the social network is starting to take the criticism to heart. On Thursday, Facebook introduced several new privacy features, including a change to default posting settings and the addition of a “Privacy Checkup.”
Facebook added the ability to post publicly back in 2009. Unbeknownst to most users, the default posting setting was “Public.” Now, Facebook has changed the default to “Friends Only,” ensuring that no one accidentally shares posts with the general public anymore. Finally, Facebook is putting that choice back into the hands of each individual user. In fact, Facebook will encourage users to keep their posts just between friends with little pop up windows that will prompt users to make the choice.
The icon that lets you choose between making a post viewable by the public or your just friends used to be hidden at the bottom of the screen as a small image. Now, in the mobile app, that selector has been moved to the top of the post and clearly says “Friends” or “Public,” letting you know the choice is in your hands – not Facebook’s. The selector is also more clearly marked on the Web version of Facebook. These new selectors will start rolling out in the coming weeks for testing. 
In addition to the new selector tools and changed default setting, Facebook has also added a “Privacy Checkup” feature, which allows users to see what information apps are using and sharing from your account. It also shows you with whom you are sharing posts. Facebook will also soon add the new “Anonymous Login” feature that was announced at the F8 developer conference. The new feature will allow users to log into apps anonymously, so that they can test them out before they commit to sharing their personal Facebook data. 
Facebook Privacy Checkup mobile
Facebook will also add an updated control panel, where you can view all the permissions you have given to third-party apps. The new control panel will give you more control over what information from your profile you choose to share with each individual app using Facebook login. All of these updates will continue rolling out to users in the next few weeks.
Facebook will still undoubtedly collect and share your data with advertisers and other slightly unsavory characters, but now the social network will at least grant its users the semblance of control and privacy.

You are your own digital bodyguard

RTXXZVX.jpg


It’s easier to steal your identity than it is to steal your car.

Many cars have GPS and can be tracked and even disabled remotely. And when your car's gone, you know it. But criminals can steal your personal information, get fraudulent credit cards, even hijack your computer without you being any the wiser. So while car thefts decline (down 3.2 percent nationwide in the first half of last year, according to the FBI), cybercrime is on the rise.

Last weekend, U.S. and European authorities took down two networks responsible for hijacking and extorting money from hundreds of thousands of computer users. One popular malware program that the authorities targeted was GameOver Zeus, which surreptitiously recorded passwords to financial institutions on hundreds of thousands of PCs and sent the information back to the hackers.

Most companies are helpless to protect you in the face of such attacks. EBay, the online auction house, recently had to warn 145 million users to change their passwords because hackers stole email addresses, passwords, birthdates and mailing addresses from the site. Unfortunately, the warning came much too late; the hack occurred months ago.
The moral of the story is that you have to protect yourself. Here are my Top 5 Cybersecurity Tips. Follow them. NOW!

Tighten up your e-mail
Your strongest, toughest password should be the one you use for email. Most sites and services rely on email to verify changes to your account or warn you of unusual transactions that may indicate a security breech, so your email account is your last line of defense.
Don’t just choose a random collection of letters and numbers. The best way to secure your password, according to security professionals, is to make it a complete sentence (if that’s possible; some sites limit the length of your password). Programs that try hammering away at random passwords rarely generate sentences. Lastly, do not use this password anywhere else. If you use it on another site, such as eBay, and it gets hacked, you'll make your entire online life vulnerable.

Use antivirus software
There is no such thing as an impregnable line of defense. No antivirus software will catch every piece of malware; there are simply too many new programs and approaches to hacking into your computer to guarantee you’ll stop them all. But just because a door can be kicked in doesn't mean you shouldn't bother to lock your home.
There are plenty of basic, reputable and free antivirus programs from the likes of AVG, Avast, and Bitdefender. Not using one of them is foolhardy.

Don't click that link
This may sound extreme, but you should never click on a link embedded in any email. Never, ever, ever. That means no videos of cats riding Roombas. No Rickrolling. Many of the most effective attacks use what looks like a legitimate email to trick you into clicking – and then you're infected. CryptoLocker, one of the programs authorities targeted last weekend, often used spurious UPS and FedEx tracking messages (I've received plenty of them myself). Don't fall for it. Go directly to the official site by typing the actual, legitimate address into your browser. If there's really an important message for you, you'll find it there.

Dump Windows XP
According to the security firm Avast, tens of millions of computers around the world are still running Microsoft's Windows XP operating system. But Microsoft, for all intents and purposes, has abandoned the software by ceasing all security updates for it. (There is a hack to continue updates, but the hack probably makes the computer even more vulnerable.) The best way to deal with this is to get a new computer. It may feel like a form of blackmail, but you're better off buying a new laptop for about £300 than sticking with a system that criminals can break into easily.

Protect your phone
Although it is not as endemic as malware for laptops and PCs, smartphones are drawing more attention from hackers. Security firms recently found several viruses posing as legitimate apps. Meanwhile, more of us are using our phones for banking, paying bills, even as digital wallets. Again, use one of the free programs – Lookout or AVG, for example – to protect your phone as you would your PC. Finally, according to a Consumer Reports survey, 34 percent of smartphone owners don't bother to password-protect their phones. Don't be one of that minority: Lock your phone down.


PCI Express: The next frontier for hard drives

intelp3700
Hard drives have seen their performance improve more than any other component over the last half-decade, all thanks to the popularization of solid state tech. Now, there’s a big leap forward that looks like it’s ready to become more widespread for consumers; SSDs that connect via PCI Express. Already used in some high-end systems, like the Mac Pro and a handful of Ultrabooks, these super-quick drives could soon be super-obtainable.

PCI what?

PCI Express (PCIe) stands for Peripheral Component Interconnect Express, a standard that was defined in 2004 by a collaboration which included Intel, IBM, HP and others. The connection, which is long and skinny (like a RAM slot), was developed to handle every type of internal card imaginable, from sound cards to video cards, and beyond. That meant the standard’s bandwidth had to be extremely high, and it also meant that each of the standard’s data channels had to handle data flowing in two directions at once.
 PCIExpress-1
A single PCIe 3.0 lane can handle almost a gigabyte of data per second, which means that a 4x slot can transfer about four gigabytes per second. PCI Express can handle up to sixteen lanes in a single slot, which equals nearly sixteen gigabytes of bandwidth. As if that wasn’t enough, the next version of the standard plans to double the per-lane bandwidth, raising the ceiling to 31.5 gigabytes per second across a 16-lane slot.
SATA6, by comparison, can only handle up to six gigabytes per second, which puts it at a huge disadvantage. Even Thunderbolt, which combines PCIe with DisplayPort into a single standard, can only manage about 1.25 gigabytes per second, per channel (the standard has two channels). 

Why now?

All this talk of gigabytes and bandwidth makes PCI Express seem like a natural fit for hard drives. So natural, in fact, that you may be wondering why it was never used before.
This is partially due to the sudden rise in hard drive speeds. Prior to 2008, the year Intel released its first consumer SSD and kicked off the competition in that market, hard drives simply couldn’t saturate a single SATA connection. Even early solid state drives couldn’t thoroughly use a single SATA3 port.
The internal layout of desktops and laptops was different in 2004, as well. Expansion cards were far more common. Many systems had a sound card, a video card and a networking card, all of which took up space, and left little for other components. Today, however, these features are already integrated into the motherboard, or even (in some cases) the processor.
Finally, there’s an inertia to every standard that can be difficult to overcome. SATA and PCIe drives require different drivers to optimize their efficiency, and while hard drive companies know a lot about developing for SATA, they don’t have much experience developing for PCIe. Drive makers saw no need to spend money researching and developing new drivers for PCIe when SATA got the job done.
Now there is a need, however, because there’s no other obvious path forward. SATA can’t keep up with the advances of solid state performance, and is restricting the potential that drive makers can extract from their hardware. An alternative is needed, and choosing PCIe makes more sense than developing a brand new standard from scratch. 

Intel, a leader again

As mentioned, Intel’s entry into the consumer solid state market with its original offering, the X25-M, is what kicked off the competition. The company proved that a reasonably affordable and extremely quick SSD appealed to PC enthusiasts, setting a precedent for others.
intelpseries
History seems to be repeating itself. Intel announced a family of new PCI Express SSDs at Computex, which includes the P3700, P3600 and P3500 series. The most affordable of the set, the P3500, offers 400GB of storage, and transfer speeds exceeding two gigabytes, for just $599.
“Just $599” may still sound like a lot, but the current crop of PCI Express drives is thin indeed. Asus, Plextor, and VisionTek are the only companies with PCIe options in-stock at Newegg as of this writing. What’s available is very expensive; the Asus Raider, for example, retails at $349 for 240GB of storage, and quotes transfer speeds that are half as quick as Intel’s P3500. Intel’s new offerings are a solid value compared to what’s already around.

A kick in the butt 

Clearly, Intel’s lineup of PCI Express drives, which should arrive in the coming months, stomps on everything else that is available. Once launched, these devices will essentially become the solid state drives to buy – provided you have at least $600 to spend, of course.
The Intel X25-M launched in essentially the same position back in 2008, but it didn’t remain on the throne for long. Competitors quickly entered the market, some small (like Corsair), and some large (like Samsung). We’ll no doubt see a repeat of that over the next year or so.
 intelp3700
Don’t expect the revolution to stick to desktops, either. PCI Express drives are already found in some laptops, most notably those built by Apple. Increased proliferation of the technology will lower prices, and spur innovation that spans both desktops and notebooks. In fact, PCI Express hard drives are often prefect for laptops, because they’re very thin, and can be packaged in creative ways. 
Chances are you won’t be purchasing one of Intel’s first P-series drives.  The push for 4K will increase file sizes, however, and quick storage solutions will be needed to make the transfer of Ultra HD content (be it movies, photos or textures for PC games) manageable. A PCI Express drive may not be in your immediate future, but the technology will be hard to avoid within a few years, taking hard drives to an entirely new level of performance.